A brazen attack on air safety is underway — here’s what’s at stake
- The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) held a public hearing to investigate a mid-air collision over Washington, DC that killed 67 people.
- The investigation revealed that existing safety rules could have prevented the disaster, but regulators have become hesitant to enforce these rules due to industry pressure for more flights and lower costs.
- The Trump administration is moving to undermine the regulatory state’s efforts to improve air safety, rather than addressing the root causes of the problem.
- Industry demands for increased flights and reduced costs are seen as a major contributor to the decline in air safety regulations.
- The situation highlights concerns about the government’s willingness to prioritize economic interests over public safety, particularly when it comes to regulating the aviation industry.
At the end of July, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) convened a three-day public hearing to investigate January’s mid-air collision over Washington, DC that killed 67 people. After the hearing, two conclusions were inescapable.
First, the disaster should have been prevented by existing safety rules. And second, the government regulators responsible for air safety have become hesitant to enforce those rules, especially when it means standing up to industry demands for more flights and lower costs.
Instead of fixing the regulatory state’s institutional cowardice, however, the Trump administration is moving to undermine it ev …
Read the full story at The Verge.
Q. What was the purpose of the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) three-day public hearing?
A. The NTSB convened a public hearing to investigate the mid-air collision over Washington, DC in January that killed 67 people.
Q. What were two conclusions that were inescapable after the public hearing?
A. Two conclusions were clear: the disaster should have been prevented by existing safety rules, and government regulators responsible for air safety have become hesitant to enforce those rules.
Q. Why did the Trump administration’s actions suggest a lack of resolve to address the issue?
A. The Trump administration is moving to undermine the regulatory state’s institutional cowardice, rather than fixing the problem.
Q. What was one of the main concerns raised by the mid-air collision?
A. The disaster highlighted that existing safety rules could have prevented it.
Q. Who are the government regulators responsible for air safety?
A. Government regulators responsible for air safety include those at the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
Q. Why did the regulators become hesitant to enforce safety rules?
A. Regulators became hesitant to enforce safety rules, especially when it means standing up to industry demands for more flights and lower costs.
Q. What is the Trump administration’s proposed action on air safety regulations?
A. The Trump administration is moving to undermine existing air safety regulations.
Q. How many people were killed in the mid-air collision over Washington, DC?
A. 67 people were killed in the mid-air collision over Washington, DC.
Q. Why is it important to address the issue of air safety regulations?
A. It is crucial to address the issue of air safety regulations to prevent similar disasters and ensure public safety.
Q. What is the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) responsible for?
A. The NTSB is responsible for investigating transportation accidents, including those involving air travel.