News Warner Logo

News Warner

Inside the courthouse reshaping the future of the internet

Inside the courthouse reshaping the future of the internet

  • The E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse in Washington, DC, has become a hub for shaping the future of the internet, hosting high-stakes tech cases and lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s administration.
  • Two consequential antitrust lawsuits, FTC v. Meta and US v. Google, were heard by Judges James Boasberg and Amit Mehta between mid-April and late May, seeking to split up Silicon Valley giants.
  • The courthouse also hosted a flurry of unprecedented lawsuits against Trump’s administration, including cases related to his first 100 days in office.
  • Several DC judges, including Boasberg, had a full docket of cases during this period, covering topics such as mass-deportation attempts and government agency actions.
  • The courthouse’s role in shaping the future of the internet is significant, with its decisions potentially impacting the tech industry and the country’s online landscape.

The E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse in Washington, DC.

The future of the internet will be determined in one building in Washington, DC – and for six weeks, I watched it unfold.

For much of this spring, the E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse in downtown Washington, DC, was buzzing with lawyers, reporters, and interested onlookers jostling between dimly lit courtrooms that hosted everyone from the richest men in Silicon Valley to fired federal workers and the DOGE-aligned officials who terminated them. The sprawling courthouse, with an airy atrium in the middle and long, dark halls that spring from it, is where cases involving government agencies often land, and that meant it was hosting two of the most consequential tech cases in the country, all while fielding a flurry of unprecedented lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s administration.

Between mid-April and late May, Judges James Boasberg and Amit Mehta respectively oversaw FTC v. Meta and US v. Google, a pair of long-running antitrust lawsuits that seek to split up two titans of Silicon Valley. Over the same period, several DC judges – including Boasberg – had a full docket of cases related to Trump’s first 100 days in office, covering the administration’s attempt to mass-depor …

Read the full story at The Verge.

link

Q. Where was the author watching the unfolding of the future of the internet?
A. The E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse in Washington, DC.

Q. What were two of the most consequential tech cases being heard at the courthouse?
A. FTC v. Meta and US v. Google, a pair of long-running antitrust lawsuits against Silicon Valley titans.

Q. Who oversaw the FTC v. Meta case?
A. Judge James Boasberg.

Q. How many DC judges had a full docket of cases related to Trump’s first 100 days in office?
A. Several, including Judge Boasberg.

Q. What was one of the administration’s attempts during its first 100 days in office?
A. Mass-deportation efforts.

Q. Where is the E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse located?
A. In downtown Washington, DC.

Q. What is unique about the courthouse’s design?
A. It has an airy atrium in the middle and long, dark halls that spring from it.

Q. Who was another judge overseeing cases at the courthouse?
A. Judge Amit Mehta.

Q. How long did the author spend watching the unfolding of the future of the internet at the courthouse?
A. Six weeks.

Q. What is the significance of the courthouse in determining the future of the internet?
A. It will determine the future of the internet due to the cases being heard there.