Discovery challenges decades-old ideas about brain flexibility
- A new study challenges decades-old assumptions about brain flexibility by revealing that the brain uses distinct transmission sites to achieve different types of plasticity.
- The research, published in Science Advances, found that spontaneous and evoked transmissions use separate synaptic transmission sites, each with its own developmental timeline and regulatory rules.
- The study suggests that the brain maintains consistent background activity through spontaneous signaling while refining behaviorally relevant pathways through evoked activity, supporting both homeostasis and Hebbian plasticity.
- Abnormalities in synaptic signaling have been linked to conditions like autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and substance use disorders, making a better understanding of these systems essential for identifying potential causes of neurological and psychiatric conditions.
- The findings could lead to new insights into how the brain balances stability with flexibility, which is crucial for learning, memory, and mental health, and may ultimately inform the development of new treatments for related diseases.
A new study challenges a decades-old assumption in neuroscience by showing that the brain uses distinct transmission sites—not a shared site—to achieve different types of plasticity.
The findings in Science Advances offer a deeper understanding of how the brain balances stability with flexibility, a process essential for learning, memory, and mental health.
“Our findings reveal a key organizational strategy in the brain.”
Neurons communicate through a process called synaptic transmission, where one neuron releases chemical messengers called neurotransmitters from a presynaptic terminal. These molecules travel across a microscopic gap called a synaptic cleft and bind to receptors on a neighboring postsynaptic neuron, triggering a response.
Traditionally, scientists believed spontaneous transmissions (signals that occur randomly) and evoked transmissions (signals triggered by sensory input or experience) originated from one type of canonical synaptic site and relied on shared molecular machinery.
Using a mouse model, the research team—led by Oliver Schlüter, associate professor of neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh—discovered that the brain instead uses separate synaptic transmission sites to carry out regulation of these two types of activity, each with its own developmental timeline and regulatory rules.
“We focused on the primary visual cortex, where cortical visual processing begins,” says Yue Yang, a research associate in the neuroscience department and first author of the study.
“We expected spontaneous and evoked transmissions to follow a similar developmental trajectory, but instead, we found that they diverged after eye opening.”
As the brain began receiving visual input, evoked transmissions continued to strengthen. In contrast, spontaneous transmissions plateaued, suggesting that the brain applies different forms of control to the two signaling modes.
To understand why, the researchers applied a chemical that activates otherwise silent receptors on the postsynaptic side. This caused spontaneous activity to increase, while evoked signals remained unchanged—strong evidence that the two types of transmission operate through functionally distinct synaptic sites.
This division likely enables the brain to maintain consistent background activity through spontaneous signaling while refining behaviorally relevant pathways through evoked activity. This dual system supports both homeostasis and Hebbian plasticity, the experience-dependent process that strengthens neural connections during learning.
“Our findings reveal a key organizational strategy in the brain,” says Yang. “By separating these two signaling modes, the brain can remain stable while still being flexible enough to adapt and learn.”
The implications could be broad. Abnormalities in synaptic signaling have been linked to conditions like autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and substance use disorders. A better understanding of how these systems operate in the healthy brain may help researchers identify how they become disrupted in disease.
“Learning how the brain normally separates and regulates different types of signals brings us closer to understanding what might be going wrong in neurological and psychiatric conditions,” Yang says.
Support for the work came from grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Whitehall Foundation, the Alzheimer’s Association, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and under Germany’s Excellence Strategy.
Source: University of Pittsburgh
The post Discovery challenges decades-old ideas about brain flexibility appeared first on Futurity.