News Warner Logo

News Warner

Why Donald Trump’s environmental data purge is so much worse this time

Why Donald Trump’s environmental data purge is so much worse this time

  • President Donald Trump’s administration has destroyed 70% more federal website changes during his first 100 days in office in 2025 compared to the start of his first term in 2017.
  • The destruction of online environmental resources is worse this time around, with broader swings by federal agencies to remove public resources from their websites.
  • A watchdog group has recorded a significant increase in website changes, highlighting the administration’s efforts to conceal environmental data and information.
  • This purge is part of Trump’s larger polluting agenda, which aims to undermine environmental regulations and transparency.
  • The destruction of online environmental resources is a concerning trend that may have long-term consequences for public access to critical climate and environmental data.

Now that we’re about halfway into the first year of President Donald Trump’s second term, we can take stock of his administration’s destruction of online environmental resources. It’s worse than last time. It’s also, seemingly, just the beginning – paving the way forward for the president’s polluting agenda.

A watchdog group that monitors publicly-available environmental data has recorded 70 percent more federal website changes during Trump’s first 100 days in office in 2025 compared to the start of his first term in 2017.

Federal agencies are taking broader swings to ax public resources from their websites this time around, the report sh …

Read the full story at The Verge.

link

Q. What is the current state of President Donald Trump’s environmental data purge?
A. The administration’s destruction of online environmental resources has worsened compared to his first term, with a significant increase in federal website changes.

Q. How many percent more federal website changes have been recorded during Trump’s first 100 days in office in 2025 compared to the start of his first term in 2017?
A. A watchdog group has recorded 70% more federal website changes during Trump’s first 100 days in office in 2025.

Q. What is the purpose of the report on federal website changes?
A. The report aims to monitor publicly-available environmental data and track changes made by federal agencies to their websites.

Q. Why are federal agencies taking a broader approach to axing public resources from their websites?
A. It appears that this approach is part of President Trump’s polluting agenda, paving the way for further destruction of online environmental resources.

Q. What is the significance of the timing of these changes (2025 vs 2017)?
A. The changes in 2025 are happening during Trump’s second term, suggesting a pattern of continued environmental degradation under his administration.

Q. Who or what group is monitoring the changes to federal websites?
A. A watchdog group is tracking and reporting on the changes made by federal agencies to their websites.

Q. What does this report indicate about President Trump’s environmental policies?
A. The report suggests that President Trump’s environmental policies are focused on destruction rather than protection, with a significant increase in website changes indicating a broader agenda.

Q. How is this change affecting the availability of environmental data online?
A. The destruction of online environmental resources makes it more difficult for the public to access and utilize environmental data, hindering efforts to track and address environmental issues.

Q. What does the report suggest about President Trump’s intentions regarding environmental policy?
A. The report implies that President Trump is intentionally destroying online environmental resources as part of his polluting agenda.

Q. What can be inferred from the increase in federal website changes during Trump’s first 100 days in office in 2025?
A. The significant increase in website changes suggests that President Trump’s administration is taking a more aggressive approach to axing public resources, potentially setting the stage for further environmental degradation.