News Warner Logo

News Warner

Martin Shkreli can be sued for copying Wu-Tang’s one-of-a-kind record

Martin Shkreli can be sued for copying Wu-Tang’s one-of-a-kind record

  • Martin Shkreli can be sued for allegedly copying Wu-Tang’s exclusive album “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin” and diminishing its value.
  • A US District Judge has allowed a lawsuit alleging “misappropriation of trade secrets” to continue, despite dismissing some claims by the album’s current owners, PleasrDAO.
  • PleasrDAO alleges that Shkreli planned to release his copies of the album, which they paid $4 million for in a government auction, and accused him of playing it for his followers during livestreams.
  • Shkreli had admitted to making copies of the album and even taunted a member of PleasrDAO with “LOL i have the mp3s you moron” on social media.
  • The lawsuit seeks damages and potentially jail time for Shkreli, who was convicted felon and has been ordered to hand over any remaining copies of the album.

Wu-Tang’s Once Upon a Time in Shaolin

Disgraced pharma bro, convicted felon, and perennial challenger for America’s Most Hateable Man, Martin Shkreli will have to face a lawsuit for making copies of the Wu-Tang Clan’s Once Upon a Time in Shaolin. US District Judge Pamela Chen issued a decision on Thursday that dismissed some claims by the album’s current owners, PleasrDAO, but will allow the suit alleging “misappropriation of trade secrets” to continue.

Trade secrets might seem like an odd way to describe the most exclusive album ever made, but Chen says in her decision that:

“Trade secrets include all forms and types of business information” so long as the criteria described above pertaining to “reasonable measures” to maintain secrecy and the “independent economic value” from that secrecy are met.

Continuing to say that there was, “no serious debate that the value of the Album… was largely based on its secret and exclusive nature.”

In August, Shkreli was forced to hand over any copies of Once Upon a Time in Shaolin, after PleasrDAO (a sort of crypto art collective) sued him for improperly retaining copies of the album and diminishing its value. The group even alleges that Shkreli planned to release his copies which PleasrDAO paid roughly $4 million for in a government auction

According to the filing by PleasrDAO Shkreli admitted in livestreams that he had made copies of the album and accused him of playing it for his followers. He even supposedly taunted a member of the DAO, replying to a photo of the album with “LOL i have the mp3s you moron.” One thing seems clear, jail time and being forced to hand over one of his most valuable possessions hasn’t made Shkreli any more reserved.

link

Q. Who is suing Martin Shkreli for copying Wu-Tang’s record?
A. PleasrDAO, a sort of crypto art collective.

Q. What was the value of the album that Martin Shkreli was sued for?
A. The value of the album “Once Upon a Time in Shaolin” was largely based on its secret and exclusive nature.

Q. Why did Martin Shkreli have to hand over copies of the album?
A. He had to hand over copies of the album after PleasrDAO sued him for improperly retaining copies and diminishing its value.

Q. How much did PleasrDAO pay for the original copies of the album?
A. PleasrDAO paid roughly $4 million for the original copies of the album in a government auction.

Q. What did Martin Shkreli allegedly do with his copies of the album?
A. He made copies of the album and accused one of his followers of being a “moron” after showing them the album.

Q. Why was Martin Shkreli allowed to continue the lawsuit despite some claims being dismissed?
A. US District Judge Pamela Chen allowed the suit alleging “misappropriation of trade secrets” to continue, as there was no serious debate about the value of the album based on its secret and exclusive nature.

Q. What is a “trade secret”, according to the judge’s decision?
A. A trade secret includes all forms and types of business information that meet certain criteria, such as maintaining secrecy and having independent economic value from that secrecy.