Weights may beat running for preventing diabetes
- Researchers found that resistance training (weightlifting) may be more effective than running in preventing diabetes and obesity.
- A study published in the Journal of Sport and Health Science compared the effects of endurance exercise (running) and resistance exercise (weightlifting) on mice fed a high-fat diet, and found that weightlifting reduced subcutaneous and visceral fat, improved glucose tolerance, and lowered insulin resistance.
- The benefits of resistance training were not explained by changes in muscle mass or exercise performance, suggesting unique metabolic mechanisms at play.
- According to the study’s lead author, Zhen Yan, “Weight training has equal, if not better, anti-diabetes benefits” than running, making it a viable alternative for people who cannot engage in endurance-type exercise.
- The researchers’ findings support the idea that a well-balanced exercise program that includes both endurance and resistance training can provide comprehensive health benefits and may even inform new drug therapies for Type 2 diabetes.
Running may help burn calories, but when it comes to preventing diabetes and obesity, pumping iron might have the edge, according to preclinical findings.
The research in the Journal of Sport and Health Science compared the effects of endurance and resistance exercise in mice fed a high-fat diet, a widely used model of obesity, hyperglycemia, and Type 2 diabetes.
A team led by exercise medicine researcher Zhen Yan found that while both running and weightlifting helped the body clear excess sugar from the blood, resistance training was more effective in reducing subcutaneous and visceral fat, improving glucose tolerance, and lowering insulin resistance—key factors in preventing and managing diabetes.
“We all want to live a long, healthy life,” says Yan, professor and director of the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech. “We all know the benefits of regular exercise. There is plenty of evidence in humans that both endurance exercise, such as running, and resistance exercise, such as weightlifting, are effective in promoting insulin sensitivity.”
But while both support metabolic function, a rigorous side-by-side comparison was lacking. Is one type of exercise better than the other?
To conduct the first direct, controlled comparison, members of the research team built something that had not previously existed: a mouse model of weightlifting.
In this model, mice lived in specially designed cages where food was accessed through a hinged, weighted lid. To eat, the mice had to lift the lid while wearing a small shoulder collar, causing a squat-like movement that engaged the muscle contractions people use during resistance exercise. The load was gradually increased over several days, mimicking progressive strength training.
For the endurance group, mice were given open access to a running wheel, an established model of aerobic exercise. Control groups included sedentary mice on either a normal or high-fat diet.
Over eight weeks, the researchers monitored weight gain, body composition, and fat distribution. They tested exercise capacity with treadmill runs, assessed heart and muscle function, and measured how well the mice regulated blood sugar. They also analyzed skeletal muscle tissue to study insulin signaling at the molecular level.
Using their novel model of resistance exercise, team members were able to directly compare how the two training styles affect obesity, blood glucose, and insulin sensitivity in a way that closely mirrors human exercise.
“Our data showed that both running and weightlifting reduce fat in the abdomen and under the skin and improve blood glucose maintenance with better insulin signaling in skeletal muscle,” Yan says. “Importantly, weightlifting outperforms running in these health benefits.”
Diabetes and obesity are major public health challenges, fueled by sedentary lifestyles and high-fat diets. The findings underscore decades of clinical trials that show endurance, resistance, and high-intensity interval training all reduce HbA1c—a key measure of long-term blood sugar control—while also lowering body mass index, blood pressure, and improving quality of life.
The new study helps fill a critical gap by directly comparing voluntary running and weightlifting in a controlled, preclinical model of diet-induced obesity.
“The findings also bring good news for people who, for any number of reasons, cannot engage in endurance-type exercise,” Yan says. “Weight training has equal, if not better, anti-diabetes benefits.”
The researchers also saw changes in skeletal muscle signaling pathways that could inform new drug therapies for Type 2 diabetes.
Interestingly, the benefits of resistance training were not explained by changes in muscle mass or exercise performance, suggesting unique metabolic mechanisms at play.
Yan says the study underscores the idea that, while popular drug interventions like GLP-1 agonists can help with diabetes management and weight loss, they do not replace the unique, accessible, and comprehensive benefits of a well-balanced exercise program.
“The take-home message is that you should do both endurance and resistance exercise, if possible, to get the most health benefit,” says Yan, who is also a professor in the human nutrition, foods, and exercise department in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Virginia Tech.
Researchers from the University of Virginia also contributed to the work.
Support for this research came from grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and the Red Gates Foundation.
Source: Virginia Tech
The post Weights may beat running for preventing diabetes appeared first on Futurity.